Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pisze:
Author: giacomo
Date: Fri Sep 28 04:13:23 2007
New Revision: 580303
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=580303&view=rev
Log:
branch Avalon based CForm blocks
Added:
cocoon/branches/cocoon-2.2/cocoon-forms-avalon-based/
- copied from r580301, cocoon/trunk/blocks/cocoon-forms/
Hmmm, does such structure and directory naming makes sense? I would expect
creation of directory
like this:
cocoon/branches/cocoon-forms-1.0.x
Putting Cocoon Forms 1.0.0 into cocoon-2.2 does not make sense because form
block wouldn't be
necessary tied to 2.2 of core.
That might be true but e.g. for the documentation we agreed to put all blocks
unter http://cocoon.apache.org/2.2 because we also can't say that
cocoon-forms-1.0.x will work with all future Cocoon releases.
When cocoon-forms-1.0.x is still compatible with e.g. Cocoon 2.3, then we create
just another branch cocoon/branches/cocoon-2.3/cocoon-forms-1.0.x/ (though I
hardly believe that this will happen ...)
--
Reinhard Pötz Independent Consultant, Trainer & (IT)-Coach
{Software Engineering, Open Source, Web Applications, Apache Cocoon}
web(log): http://www.poetz.cc
--------------------------------------------------------------------
