On Aug 6, 2008, at 5:17 AM, Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Reinhard Pötz wrote:
I agree with you that we shouldn't support such stuff but what
features do we want to see in a new LinkRewriteTransformer? (...
hence my suggestion that we start with a
ServletLinkRewriteTransformer because we know that we need it.)
Any comments, otherwise I still believe that we only need a
ServletLinkRewriteTransformer and will advise Lukas to go towards
this direction.
I'd suggest to start with ServletLinkRewriteTransformer. When/if needs
for other features become clear, it should be possible to implement
full version by extending from the basic ServletLinkRewriteTransformer
version.
Vadim
