Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Ralph Goers wrote: > > My recommendation would be to develop it here first and once it is in a > > state where it might be usable then we should look at it and figure out > > what the right thing to do is. > > I think, the stuff we have is already usable :) > > > The problem we are faced with is that > > the xml project only has the JAXP API and the resolver left and commons > > doesn't really have anything because XML Commons was always around. I > > guess the various PMCs should talk about a plan for where this kind of > > code should reside. > > Yes, let's start here, see where we end up with and then get the > *communities* (xlm, commons, cocoon) together for further discussions. > But as I said, as we are shifting away from a monolithic big bang > framework to finer grained reusable modules, it might make sense to have > this common xml stuff here and maybe use it for "marketing" :)
That is no joke. It is a very relevant approach. Thanks for sparking this. -David
