David Crossley wrote: > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >> Yes, let's start here, see where we end up with and then get the >> *communities* (xlm, commons, cocoon) together for further discussions. >> But as I said, as we are shifting away from a monolithic big bang >> framework to finer grained reusable modules, it might make sense to have >> this common xml stuff here and maybe use it for "marketing" :) > > That is no joke. It is a very relevant approach. > Yes, I meant this seriously! (maybe I shouldn't have put a smiley next to it :)...)
Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [email protected]
