Hi, It's again me trying to understand current sitemap design. This time I wonder if it's intended that redirect-to/@uri is optional. I fail to see how implementation of redirect-to handles this case in any meaningful way.
The same concern (about too many of optional attributes) applies to call instruction. BTW. Was the idea of having extensible sitemap syntax discussed earlier? As it something new I wonder what was the main idea behind such a design decision. Thanks for you patient answers. -- Best regards, Grzegorz Kossakowski
