Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's again me trying to understand current sitemap design. This time
> I wonder if it's intended that redirect-to/@uri is optional. I fail
> to see how implementation of redirect-to handles this case in any
> meaningful way.
I haven't tried it now what happens if the there is no @uri attribute
but from reading the code some exception in the RedirectorComponent will
occur. It's probably better to throw a meaningful exception in the
RedirectorNode.
> The same concern (about too many of optional attributes) applies to
> call instruction.
>
> BTW. Was the idea of having extensible sitemap syntax discussed
> earlier? As it something new I wonder what was the main idea behind
> such a design decision.
Why do you think that this is new? When Sylvain wrote the TreeProcessor,
one of his main goals was extensibility.
--
Reinhard Pötz Managing Director, {Indoqa} GmbH
http://www.indoqa.com/en/people/reinhard.poetz/
Member of the Apache Software Foundation
Apache Cocoon Committer, PMC member reinh...@apache.org
________________________________________________________________________
