great news!!! have a nice WE, all the best!!! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/
2011/8/5 Francesco Chicchiriccò <ilgro...@apache.org>: > Hi folks, > short time after asking [1], people at infrastructure made a custom ruleset > for Cocoon at Sonar [2] and we have no more Blocker or Critical violations. > > Kudos to the infrastructure team! > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3828 > [2] https://analysis.apache.org/rules_configuration/index/10 > > On 05/08/2011 11:57, Steven Dolg wrote: >> >> Am 05.08.2011 11:25, schrieb Nathaniel, Alfred: >>> >>> Hi Francesco, >>> >>> I am a big fan of Findbugs and persueing a zero-warnings policy. >>> In other projects we use a Findbugs exclude filter file to >>> disable warnings and document the deliberation for doing so. >> >> That's what we do as well. >> TBH, the default ruleset contains more than one rule that I find highly >> suspicious if not outright stupid. >> Zero warnings is IMO the only way to go, same as with unit tests. >> >>> >>> Sonar should foresee to pull such an exclude filter from the >>> project's code base. >>> >>> NB we also exclude XFB_XML_FACTORY_BYPASS with reason >>> "axis.client.Stub requires specific axis.message.SOAPHeaderElement". >> >> Maybe we should try to get our own set of rules (there are rulesets "CXF >> Rules with Findbugs" and "My Faces with Findbugs", so I guess that's >> possible). >> >> I think it's easier to start with a more lenient ruleset, work (close) to >> 0 warnings and then add a couple more restrictions and repeat. >> Sitting in front of hundreds of warnings can be a frustrating situation... >> >> Steven >> >>> >>> Cheers, Alfred. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [mailto:ilgro...@apache.org] >>> Sent: Freitag, 5. August 2011 08:50 >>> To: dev@cocoon.apache.org >>> Subject: Filtering out (some) Sonar violations >>> >>> ... >>> >>> My proposal would be to open a issue to INFRA in order to ask for >>> disabling these two rules: do you see any problem, with this? >>> >>> For my personal experience about Findbugs, PMD and Checkstyle, it is >>> rather impossible to satisfy all the rules (thus bringing the number of >>> violations to zero); however, I personally think that reducing the huge >>> amount that we have at the moment would dramatically improve Cocoon 3's >>> source code quality. >>> >>> ... >>> >>> The content of this e-mail is intended only for the confidential use of >>> the person addressed. >>> If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender and >>> delete this e-mail immediately. >>> Thank you. > > -- > Francesco Chicchiriccò > > Apache Cocoon Committer and PMC Member > http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/ > >
