I'd be +1 to retire 2.1.x Even if I have fond memories of it, as it was my first major apache project.
However it's grown quite old technically and refreshing things would be a huge effort. Some of the jvm versions needed are no longer available and I failed to even build it on 1.8. Don't think it's worth the effort :-( Chris Gesendet von Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> ________________________________ From: Cédric Damioli <cdami...@apache.org> Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 7:06:08 PM To: dev@cocoon.apache.org <dev@cocoon.apache.org> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Retiring 2.1.x ? (Was: Re: Future of the Cocoon project) Le 01/12/2023 à 18:13, Cédric Damioli a écrit : > > We'd like to know whether you'd prefer: > [ ] retiring Cocoon 2.1.x > [ ] reviving/maintaining Cocoon 2.1.x, meaning that you volunteer to > be somehow involved > I'd vote +/-0 here ... Definitively the toughest for me ... I still heavily use Cocoon 2.1 core, but I recognize that it's an very old piece of software, and that maintaining it here would demand more and more work. Perhaps it could be wiser to also let it go, and then fork the core elsewhere if needed with a new build system, without all block stuff, ... I'm curious to see what will others say about it. Cédric
