I vote for karma. On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Dan Fabulich <d...@fabulich.com> wrote:
> Henri Yandell wrote: > > 742870 - ?? - Lacking Unit Tests, not liking the catch Exception. >> RuntimeException throwing needs String arg. Generally not trusting the >> Java API here to work beautifully and wanting to have covered a bunch >> of use cases. >> > > Thanks for reviewing! > > I tweaked exception handling and added unit tests in bugfixing branch > revision 747449. As I wrote the unit tests I manuallly looked at the > exception stacktraces and verified that they provided useful error messages > to the user. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=747449 > > I also merged those changes to java5 branch revision 747452. > > So apart from the one commit, I'm +1 on the changes on the bugfixes >> branch. >> > > In that case, I think we're ready to contemplate executing the plan I'd > identified earlier: > > If I were a commons/dbutils committer right now, I think I'd probably do >>> these things (all of which require committer karma): >>> >>> 1) Merge "bugfixing" back to trunk >>> 2) Close out all of the bugs I fixed >>> 3) Stage/vote on a dbutils-1.2 release based on bugfixing/trunk >>> 4) Make a dbutils/1.x branch >>> 5) Merge "java5" back to trunk >>> 6) Stage/vote on a dbutils-2.0 release based on java5/trunk >>> >> > How do we want to begin work on this? Henri, do you want to these steps? > Alternately, I can do them myself if I get the karma to do so...? > > > -Dan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
