Liam Coughlin wrote:
DBUTILS-49 QueryRunner - fillStatement method does not work for PostgreSQL database drivers<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-49> I'm pretty sure this is addressed with the fill change to use the parametermetadata.
Yes, this bug is yet another dupe of DBUTILS-44 and friends. I think it's fixed in 742865... This bug was heavily duplicated, not surprising that I missed a copy.
DBUTILS-48 Maintaining a parallel Java 1.5 version of DButils<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-49> You folks are covering this with the different branch configs post buf fix.
+1, close it.
DBUTILS-47 Add a StatementFiller to be able to provide a Bean for updates, instead of bean values.<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-49> I'm pretty sure this is outside the scope of dbutils, and would be covered by things users of the library add to it's extensible framework. DBUTILS-43 an helper set of classes for JDBC processing with prepared statement <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-49> This is not trivial -- tackle it now, or tackle it later?
I see DBUTILS-47 and DBUTILS-43 as dupes of DBUTILS-29, fixed in 742870 (and tweaked in later revisions). They all just want to have some way of using a bean or Object[] to manage a PreparedStatement, IMO.
DBUTILS-30 [dbutils] New ResultSetHandler - ObjectHandler<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-49> I'm pretty sure this is outside the scope of dbutils, and would be covered by things users of the library add to it's extensible framework.
Indeed, I felt the best way to handle this was to use BeanUtils.copyProperties. We should just close this bug out.
DBUTILS-28 [dbutils] Stored Procedure Runner and Bean Reuse Handler code submission <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-49> This is sort of a weird double issue that rolls up DBUTILS-43 and DBUTILS-30. I think you probably want to defer any work with stored procedures for a little while because there's just more interesting and important things to work on.
DBUTILS-28 is a half-dupe of DBUTILS-30, but stored procedures (CallableStatement) is its own ball of wax not covered by DBUTILS-43 (which covers only PreparedStatements, a supertype of CallableStatement).
Regardless, I don't think we should include Kyle's patch; we should close out DBUTILS-28, in favor of DBUTILS-50 which I just filed. DBUTILS-50 should be done someday.
-Dan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
