On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:41 PM, sebb<seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Although Jexl 2.0 works OK currently with Apache BSF 3.0, it relies on > the factory & engine provided by BSF 3.0. > > Now Java 1.6 has scripting built-in, so I think it would make sense to > include the necessary classes and property file in Jexl. This would > allow it to be used without the BSF jar. > <snip/>
Right, JEXL shouldn't have additional dependencies (even optional) but javax.script is almost part of the JDK (we are at JDK 1.5, but thats OK IMO). > It should still work with the BSF jar as well - BeanShell takes a > similar approach and works OK for me with BSF 3.0 or Java 1.6. > > I'll have a look at providing these classes shortly. Cool. -Rahul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
