On 29/07/2009, Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akol...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:41 PM, sebb<seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Although Jexl 2.0 works OK currently with Apache BSF 3.0, it relies on > > the factory & engine provided by BSF 3.0. > > > > Now Java 1.6 has scripting built-in, so I think it would make sense to > > include the necessary classes and property file in Jexl. This would > > allow it to be used without the BSF jar. > > > > <snip/> > > Right, JEXL shouldn't have additional dependencies (even optional) but > javax.script is almost part of the JDK (we are at JDK 1.5, but thats > OK IMO).
JEXL does currently require commons-logging (non-optional). I'm not sure how useful the logging is - should it be kept? Could it be made optional at run-time? > > > It should still work with the BSF jar as well - BeanShell takes a > > similar approach and works OK for me with BSF 3.0 or Java 1.6. > > > > I'll have a look at providing these classes shortly. > > > > Cool. > > -Rahul > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
