On 04/03/2010, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > > while investigating an Ant issue I recently had a look at how Harmony > implements JarInputStream and friends. > > If we wanted to enable the usual JarEntry fields on top of > ZipArchiveInputStream we'd be forced to re-implement the whole > verification process for signed jars that the class library can already > do for us (in some hidden code we cannot re-use from the outside). > > The more I think about this, the more I believe we should make > JarArchiveInputStream use the java.util.jar package rather than extend > ZipArchiveInputStream - this would also mean we'd break the API of 1.0, > though.
Seems good to me. Presumably JarArchiveOutputStream should also be changed? > Stefan > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
