On 2010-03-04, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 04/03/2010, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote:
>> The more I think about this, the more I believe we should make >> JarArchiveInputStream use the java.util.jar package rather than extend >> ZipArchiveInputStream - this would also mean we'd break the API of 1.0, >> though. > Seems good to me. > Presumably JarArchiveOutputStream should also be changed? Yes, as well as JarArchiveEntry. Neither of the three classes would subclass their Zip* counterparts anymore. That's the API breakage I was talking about. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
