I think we had that discussion. I provided examples of other packages considered sampling to be a key property of a distribution, how users of these packages expected to be able to sample from distributions. Others concurred. You vetoed the contribution.
Doesn't bother me that much personally for that style of development to happen with commons math since we have just replaced commons math with other code. My guess is that other potential contributors have also wandered off as well for similar reasons.
On Mar 7, 2010, at 2:40 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote:
I am open to alternatives, but I will need clear, simple, practical arguments explaining why it is not bad separation of concerns to duplicate all of this into the distributions classes themselves
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
