Hello.

On the basis of the KISS principle, I still think that the change is
reasonable.
The strongest argument against it is based on a construction that is
currently impossible since it assumes a yet non-existent "nextSample()"
method. After that other issue (MATH-310) is resolved, we can come back to
the feature described by Ted, and I'll be willing to change back again if
necessary.
Is that OK?

Best regards,
Gilles

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to