On Nov 30, 2010, at 1:20 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 16:09 >> To: Commons Developers List >> Subject: Re: VFS release >> >> >> On Nov 30, 2010, at 1:02 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >>>> >>>> Although the wiki is fine it would be better to use a common >> checkstyle.xml. >>> >>> Yes! Can we put that in commons-parent and have it kick in automagically? >>> >> >> Not unless commons-parent is changed from a project of type pom to a project >> of type jar. The checkstyle.xml would be the only thing in the jar. This is >> actually the way the checkstyle plugin team recommends incorporating a >> checkstyle.xml into a multiproject build. > > That's fine with me. The reuse is worth it. I am sure there are other things > we can reuse as well. That make [commons] more, well, [commons]-felling. > > Would that break all projects? > It shouldn't. A project of type pom doesn't actually deliver an artifact and only deploys a pom to the repository. Any other type of project will deploy an artifact and a pom. However, I don't think I've ever worked with a project where the parent wasn't of type pom.
Ralph --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
