Hi all guys, looks like there's not enough activity/interest on new Digester, I suggest to suspend this topic for a while and come speaking about it until there will be interest from the users. Thanks to all that took part of the discussion! All the best, have a nice day, Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi all, > thanks for the trust guys!!! I won't express my vote, it would be too > incorrect IMHO. I'll keep my finger crossed to see at least the 3 > consensus :) > Have a nice weekend! > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Mar 19, 2011, at 11:05 AM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 3/19/11 4:54 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: >>>>> Hi Rahul, >>>>> thanks once again for the wise suggestions, much more than appreciated! >>>>> >>>>> I underestimated the importance of the users over the active >>>>> developers, so I totally agree with you, moving to dormant is >>>>> premature. >>>>> >>>>> I was aware about breaking APIs compatibility, since we had to face >>>>> the same problem also in [pool2], I thought it would have been a good >>>>> idea implementing the sandbox in the o.a.c.digester3[1] package, looks >>>>> like it is compliant to the suggestions you proposed. >>>>> >>>>> I like your idea of branching 1.X, 2.X and put 3 on trunk, shall we >>>>> call a vote before going on? >>>> +1 >>>> I don't think we need a VOTE on this, I would say wait a couple of more >>>> days to make sure we have (lazy) consensus and then just do it. >>>> >>> <snip/> >>> >>> Not that I care for more process, but I'd like to see 3+ of us say >>> this is the API they'd like to see for digester3. We also generally >>> require votes for getting stuff out of sandbox so a vote may not be a >>> bad idea (even if this isn't a new component, its a new API -- and >>> somewhere in there, the lines are blurred). I'm +0. >>> >> >> I hesitate to throw in an opinion as I've never really used digester, but I >> quite like the API personally, and would +1 this. >> >> Matt >> >>> -Rahul >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
