On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Matt!!! > I noticed 2 important points I'd like to discuss: > > 1) generally speaking, the bigger part of the users are lazy: they > just want to grab latest released artifact of XXX component with Maven > and use it, so it is hard to obtain feedbacks from APIs not released > yet; > 2) committers/PMCs interested on Digester is reduced: we got two +1s, > one +0 and I didn't express my opinion (If I would have done it, in my > country they would have called me Mafia guy :D ) > > I didn't understand when you wrote "I'm certainly not going to twist > your arm": of course you wouldn't do it physically :D but I didn't > understand in which sense :P >
:) Just an expression meaning to try to make you do something against your will. Matt > Have a nice day, all the best! > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 6:37 AM, Simone Tripodi >> <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote: >>> Hi all guys, >>> looks like there's not enough activity/interest on new Digester, I >>> suggest to suspend this topic for a while and come speaking about it >>> until there will be interest from the users. >>> Thanks to all that took part of the discussion! >>> All the best, have a nice day, >>> Simo >> >> Personally, I think that just because the users aren't clamoring for >> the new API doesn't mean they wouldn't like it if Digester3 were >> released. At the same time, I'm certainly not going to twist your >> arm. >> >> Matt >> >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Simone Tripodi >>> <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> thanks for the trust guys!!! I won't express my vote, it would be too >>>> incorrect IMHO. I'll keep my finger crossed to see at least the 3 >>>> consensus :) >>>> Have a nice weekend! >>>> Simo >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Mar 19, 2011, at 11:05 AM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> On 3/19/11 4:54 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi Rahul, >>>>>>>> thanks once again for the wise suggestions, much more than appreciated! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I underestimated the importance of the users over the active >>>>>>>> developers, so I totally agree with you, moving to dormant is >>>>>>>> premature. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I was aware about breaking APIs compatibility, since we had to face >>>>>>>> the same problem also in [pool2], I thought it would have been a good >>>>>>>> idea implementing the sandbox in the o.a.c.digester3[1] package, looks >>>>>>>> like it is compliant to the suggestions you proposed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I like your idea of branching 1.X, 2.X and put 3 on trunk, shall we >>>>>>>> call a vote before going on? >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> I don't think we need a VOTE on this, I would say wait a couple of more >>>>>>> days to make sure we have (lazy) consensus and then just do it. >>>>>>> >>>>>> <snip/> >>>>>> >>>>>> Not that I care for more process, but I'd like to see 3+ of us say >>>>>> this is the API they'd like to see for digester3. We also generally >>>>>> require votes for getting stuff out of sandbox so a vote may not be a >>>>>> bad idea (even if this isn't a new component, its a new API -- and >>>>>> somewhere in there, the lines are blurred). I'm +0. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I hesitate to throw in an opinion as I've never really used digester, but >>>>> I quite like the API personally, and would +1 this. >>>>> >>>>> Matt >>>>> >>>>>> -Rahul >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
