Yes, my apologies. I am a bit new to this.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm assuming this is Commons Math. I've added a [math] so it catches > the interest of those involved. > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Greg Sterijevski > <gsterijev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Additionally, I pass all of the Wampler beta estimates. > > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Greg Sterijevski > > <gsterijev...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > >> Hello All, > >> > >> I am testing the first 'updating' ols regression algorithm. I ran it > >> through the Wampler1 data. It gets 1.0s for all of the beta estimates. I > >> next ran the Longley dataset. I match, but with a tolerance of 1.0e-6. > This > >> is a bit less than two orders of magnitude worse than the current incore > >> estimator( 2.0e-8). My question to the list, is how important is this > diff? > >> Is it worth tearing things apart to figure out where the error is > >> accumulating? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> -Greg > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
