On 12 July 2011 18:56, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schai...@gmx.de> wrote: > 1/ FastDateFormat > The date format "yyyy yyy yy y" is formatted with JDK 7 as "2003 2003 03 > 2003" instead of "2003 03 03 03". So, should FastDateFormat follow the JDK > in any case and adjust its result according the runtime? Interestingly > Javadoc states already for Java 6: "For formatting, if the number of pattern > letters is 2, the year is truncated to 2 digits; otherwise it is interpreted > as a number."
I think that since this release is not compatible with previous releases, then [lang] should follow JDK 7 conventions only, with good javadoc about what it does. Stephen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
