----- Mail original ----- De: "Dave Brosius" <dbros...@apache.org> Cc: "Commons Developers List" <dev@commons.apache.org> Envoyé: Mardi 19 Juillet 2011 06:03:11 Objet: Re: [BCEL] Next release
If we can agree that BCEL will have a minimum requirement of 1.5 for the next version, then we should probably actually use 1.5 throughout on purpose, rather than by accident. I'd be happy to participate in making these changes. Can we vote on that part of it at least, so that work could start? [ ] +1, agreed +1 Luc [ ] +0, ok, but don't care [ ] -1, don't agree, with reason On 07/18/2011 12:56 PM, Torsten Curdt wrote: >> I'm all for it. > I say what I've said all this time when questions like this came up. > We need testers! There has been quite few changes. Just releasing > without some people spending some time ...or telling us "yes, trunk > works for me!" I am still not comfortable with. > >> But there needs to be a decision which seems clear cut to me. There is code >> in the code base (by accident--i suppose) now that requires 1.5. Previously >> we didn't have that requirement, so pushing out a release means raising the >> minimum to 1.5. My vote is lets do it two both. But everyone should be clear >> about this decision. Do we call it BCEL 6 because of this? > Actually that might help with the above changes, too. > > +1 for calling it 6.0 > > ...and if we get at least 3 people saying "yes, trunk works for me you > also get my +1 for a release. > Although there still might be some work in bugzilla that has > accumulated over time. > > cheers, > Torsten > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
