On 07/19/2011 05:03 AM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
+1 for using 1.5
So then let's call it 6.0? ...and work through bugzilla towards a release?
I agree with naming it 6.0. Another more important reason is that this
version of bcel is backwards incompatible with previous releases, in
this regard:
In previous releases, if client code wanted to process annotations, when
processing attributes had to look for ATTR_UNKNOWN, and once received
look at the attribute type byte and see if it matches the constants for
the various annotation values. Now with this version, you will not
receive the constant ATTR_UNKNOWN for annotations, but instead get the
first class annotation constant itself. Therefore code will break
because they will never process these annotations.
cheers,
Torsten
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
