On 2011-08-12, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > IMHO unless the main package name has to change due to binary > incompatibilities in the new version I would stick to the original > groupId/artifactId (ie org.apache.jcs/jcs).
I agree with you. But if jcs changes the artifactId (which has happened in trunk) there is no point in keeping the groupId or is there? Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org