On 2011-08-12, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:

> IMHO unless the main package name has to change due to binary
> incompatibilities in the new version I would stick to the original
> groupId/artifactId (ie org.apache.jcs/jcs).

I agree with you.  But if jcs changes the artifactId (which has happened
in trunk) there is no point in keeping the groupId or is there?

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to