On 12 August 2011 08:14, Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> wrote: > IMHO unless the main package name has to change due to binary > incompatibilities in the new version I would stick to the original > groupId/artifactId (ie org.apache.jcs/jcs).
+1, otherwise users will be forced to edit and recompile - such changes effectively make it a new component. > Emmanuel Bourg > > > Le 12/08/2011 08:41, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : >> >> Hi, >> >> while looking through the Gump setup for JCS I realized the artifactId >> inside the POM had been changed to commons-jcs while the groupId still >> is org.apache.jcs. Does it make sense to keep the old groupId when >> you change the artifactId anyway? >> >> Stefan >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
