Thank you Simo, Ok, I realized after that the graph needs at least a short explanation: In that test I have tried to test every caches which I re-engineered. In the graph you mentioned, there are depicted 3 different kind of cache implementations: 1. Concurrent HashMap (CHM) 2. Thread-safe HashMap (HM) 3. Reentrant Read Write Lock (RRWL)
As you will notice, there are some cases where RRWL is faster, other where CHM and so on. So there is no yet a real winner approach, though, at very quick look, CHM seems to be the slower one (my guess is that it's the only not-fully thread safe). To answer your question about projects merging, they surely could work under the same project, my only concern is about the execution time. At the moment I'm writing the whole execution time is near 50 seconds (currently the non-benchmark side take more or less 20 seconds). Furthermore the benchmark tests don't give you an answer in term of correctness (aside from the concurrency issues), ATM the only motivation behind them is performance measurement. Next time I could check the hit/miss ratio. Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 Linkedin :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara Maurizio Cucchiara --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
