Sure you can, before that I should merge new branch with the current trunk. Further, FYI I have just submitted a patch for a small improvement http://issues.carrot2.org/browse/JUNITBENCH-40
Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 Linkedin :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara Maurizio Cucchiara On 22 October 2011 12:17, Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Mau, > that for the explanation, that really helps on clarifying the graph!!! > > I have an idea about merging the tests in trunk with a profile > approach that I already submitted for the Disruptor project[1] - they > have performance/benchmark tests too - if it is fine for you I can > work on it - not today that's Rugby day, maybe tomorrow :) > > All the best and have a nice WE, > Simo > > [1] http://code.google.com/p/disruptor/issues/detail?id=2 > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Maurizio Cucchiara > <mcucchi...@apache.org> wrote: > > I almost forgot there are even old vs commons comparison. Stay tuned :) > > > > Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara > > G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 > > Linkedin :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara > > > > Maurizio Cucchiara > > > > > > > > On 22 October 2011 09:58, Maurizio Cucchiara <mcucchi...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> Thank you Simo, > >> Ok, I realized after that the graph needs at least a short explanation: > >> In that test I have tried to test every caches which I re-engineered. > >> In the graph you mentioned, there are depicted 3 different kind of > >> cache implementations: > >> 1. Concurrent HashMap (CHM) > >> 2. Thread-safe HashMap (HM) > >> 3. Reentrant Read Write Lock (RRWL) > >> > >> As you will notice, there are some cases where RRWL is faster, other > >> where CHM and so on. > >> So there is no yet a real winner approach, though, at very quick look, > >> CHM seems to be the slower one (my guess is that it's the only > >> not-fully thread safe). > >> > >> To answer your question about projects merging, they surely could work > >> under the same project, my only concern is about the execution time. > >> At the moment I'm writing the whole execution time is near 50 seconds > >> (currently the non-benchmark side take more or less 20 seconds). > >> Furthermore the benchmark tests don't give you an answer in term of > >> correctness (aside from the concurrency issues), ATM the only > >> motivation behind them is performance measurement. > >> Next time I could check the hit/miss ratio. > >> Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara > >> G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 > >> Linkedin :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara > >> > >> Maurizio Cucchiara > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
