On 2011-10-24, Torsten Curdt wrote: >> Do we want to add XZ support now or wait until after 1.3 has been >> released? >> In either case I'd intend to call for a vote on a first RC for Compress >> 1.3 no later than next week.
> I would skip it for this release. This seems to be consensus, expect an RC1 over the next few days. >> Do we want to release a shaded jar that pulls in XZ for Java in addition >> to our normal artifact? > I think of the shading as doing the "copy-and-paste" during compile > time. If you were to copy-and-paste the code you would also not > release a second artifact. > So I would only release the shaded jar. IIRC sebb objected to shading. We have the choice of releasing only a shaded jar, only a plain jar with a POM that states a hard-dependency or releasing two artifacts. The forth option of separating the XZ streams into a different module is not very attractive to me as I see the dependency on XZ leaking into - at least - the zip package as well. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
