On 25 October 2011 09:50, Torsten Curdt <tcu...@vafer.org> wrote: >>> So I would only release the shaded jar. >> >> IIRC sebb objected to shading. > > Why was that, sebb?
I don't recall saying that I objected; I did wonder what advantage it would give. > I cannot think of a good reason why this should be a problem. Maybe not in this case, but if the dependency is then updated AIUI using shading would prevent the user from updating the dependency independently. >> We have the choice of releasing only a >> shaded jar, only a plain jar with a POM that states a hard-dependency >> or releasing two artifacts. > > You know my preference :) Now that XZ is in Maven, it seems to me the simplest solution is to have a dependency on it. I would be inclined to try that first, and then move to shading if really required. > cheers, > Torsten > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
