On 11/6/11 12:18 AM, Sébastien Brisard wrote: >> +1, but your observation above then leads to the question where are >> you going to get this value from? There may not be a solver to read >> it from. I guess the default impl in the base class could just >> return BaseAbstractUnivariateRealSolver.DEFAULT_FUNCTION_VALUE_ACCURACY. >> >> Phil >> > Ah, that's one option I didn't think of. I intended to follow the same > scheme as for getSolverAbsoluteAccuracy(), which returns > solverAbsoluteAccuracy (private field), possibly initialized with > DEFAULT_SOLVER_ABSOLUTE_ACCURACY (see AbstractContinuousDistribution). > Actually, using the BaseAbstractUnivariateRealSolver default value is > probably better. However, these default values are private... So maybe > we will have to select reasonable default values here.
Ugh. I remember complaining about that (the fact that the defaults were made private) for precisely this kind of reason. Have to clone the value, I guess and keep it in synch with whatever Brent uses. Phil > Sébastien > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
