Dear Gilles and Phil, just a quick note to invite you to review the addition I've made to MATH-699. It turns out I'm struggling with finite precision: it is difficult to make a consistent use of thresholds. For the time being, the way I see it is that you are both right, but we can set the design issues aside right now, because the logical use of these thresholds requires discussion first. For example, I'm no longer convinced I need getSolverFunctionValueAccuracy()... So detailed implementation of this method does not really matter.
As written in MATH-699, I *will* need your help for a careful review of the code, because something seemingly as simple as detecting a plateau gives me some troubles. Also, I think we will have to contend with an implementation which is not completely fool-proof. Best regards, Sébastien --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
