On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org>wrote:
> Hi Torsten! > > > -1 for checkstyle > > With my +1 I meant that, as we discussed in another thread, the parent > could provide a default - but overridable - configuration; I think > that having at least one metric of code style measure in each > component would be nice to have, so unless other preferences, the > parent "suggests" a default config > +1. We need a default, Commons components can continue to override or decide to use the default. New components coming should use the default. Gary > > I would like to understand better your PoV (that would influence > mine): which are your concerns about having the checkstyle? > > many thanks in advance, all the best, > -Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0 Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
