Matt Benson wrote: > Urgh; I find these method names rather painful. Why wouldn't we > simply provide endianness and bit ordering as enums, and parameterize > accordingly?
Because the algorithm is different (although similar) every time and not all combinations are implemented? Honestly, we would have to use in most cases a switch/case statement internally anyway and either throw UnsupportedOperationException for the unimplemented cases or someone would have to implement it ... ;-) - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org