Matt Benson wrote:

> Urgh; I find these method names rather painful.  Why wouldn't we
> simply provide endianness and bit ordering as enums, and parameterize
> accordingly?

Because the algorithm is different (although similar) every time and not all 
combinations are implemented?

Honestly, we would have to use in most cases a switch/case statement 
internally anyway and either throw UnsupportedOperationException for the 
unimplemented cases or someone would have to implement it ... ;-)

- Jörg


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to