On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 01:13:36AM +0100, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:14:58PM +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > > Le 19/12/2012 22:04, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Luc Maisonobe > > > <luc.maison...@free.fr>wrote: > > > > > >> Le 19/12/2012 11:03, Gilles Sadowski a écrit : > > >>> Hi. > > >>> > > >>> Please have a look at the latest candidate (RC4), and vote for the > > >> release > > >>> of Commons Math 3.1. > > >>> > > >>> ---------- > > >>> Tag: > > >>> > > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_3_1_RC4/ > > >>> > > >>> Site: > > >>> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/math/3.1/RC4/ > > >>> > > >>> Binaries: > > >>> > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-048/org/apache/commons/commons-math3/3.1/ > > >>> > > >>> [X] +1 Release it. > > >> > > >> There are a few missing headers, but only in test files, so I don't > > >> think it is a blocker. > > >> > > > > > > I'm not so sure, missing headers on .java are a must IMO. > > > > I have fixed them in trunk, as well as a few checkstyle errors I missed > > earlier. > > The CheckStyle warnings were probably a consequence of fixing the Clirr > errors. > > Do we stand with your previous statement that missing headers on test files > were not a blocker? IIRC, this was the conclusion for release 3.0. Those > headers have been missing for a long time. The JIRA report will avoid that > for next time.
Well, last time, the Java files were indeed corrected to contain a license header. [The data files were deemed OK without it.] I'll create a new tag. Can someone check the problems found by Oliver on M$-Windows? Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
