Hi again Steve, another thing that came in my mind, is about a discussion between Elijah and I about dropping completely the CatalogFactory and moving the ChainConfigurationException to the configuration API module. IIRC this is still related to CHAIN-76...
TIA! -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Steve, > > thanks a lot for your interest on chains! :) > > Documentation is never enough, so if you do have some more > samples/hints/.../whatever, feel free to push one or more patches on > JIRA, I'd be more than glad to apply it! > Same thing for unit tests, or improve the test coverage - patches are > more than welcome, and playing with tests is usually a good way to get > familiar with codebase :) > > Thanks a lot in advance for your involvement, hope to read from you soon! > Have a nice day, all the best, > -Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Steve Westwood > <steve.westw...@hexsaw.org.uk> wrote: >> Hi Simone, >> >> Thanks for the response; >> >> My first thought on commons-chain relate to the other 2.0 issues apart from >> CHAIN-76 that have been delivered (which is a lot I notice - congratulations >> on getting to this point!). Are the changes in your view stable and do they >> need further tests/samples to ensure all is good (I haven't looked at test >> coverage yet). I notice cookbook sample changes (CHAIN-66) but do we need >> to provide more (plus amend documentation) to provide certainty going >> forward? I guess my thinking relates to whether work such as CHAIN-76 is a >> 2.0 or 2.1 issue. I have no strong view on this although a move away from >> XML-centric configuration is certainly desirable. >> >> For CHAIN-76, I will apply the prototype patch to a copy of the 2.0 over the >> weekend and take a closer look at what you submitted. I need to refresh my >> memory on commons-chain (its been a while...) but I like to think I can get >> up to speed fairly quickly here. >> >> Thanks again, >> >> Steve >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: simone.trip...@gmail.com [mailto:simone.trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf >> Of Simone Tripodi >> >> Sent: 13 March 2013 20:01 >> >> To: Commons Developers List; Steve Westwood >> >> Subject: Re: [Chain] Any future plans for commons-chain? >> >> >> >> Hi Steve, >> >> >> >> very nice to hear there is someone willing to put new energies on Chain! :) >> >> >> >> So, the latest step IMHO before to cut the first chain RC, is CHAIN-76[1] >> where some work has already been done but far to be completed. >> >> If you want to give a help here, there's enough space to get involved >> >> - I would be more than pleased to revamp my interest in Chains :) >> >> >> >> I hope to read from you soon! >> >> All the best! >> >> -Simo >> >> >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CHAIN-76 >> >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >> >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >> >> http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Steve Westwood >> <steve.westw...@hexsaw.org.uk> wrote: >> >>> I wanted to get a sense of what (if anything) is planned for >> >>> commons-chain. I used this in some years ago, and for various reasons >> >>> I now find myself returning to it. In examining the SVN trunk things have >>> not stood still: >> >>> - Discussions (and subsequent work) in 2011 to accommodate work as a >> >>> precursor to a chains2 from of CHAIN-53 >> >>> - A fair bit of rework to accommodate Generics/Java 5 support >> >>> - DSL like capability introduced >> >>> - Refactoring >> >>> >> >>> Of course, the last release was 2008 (1.2), hence is 2.0 imminent, or >> >>> are there other issues that require addressing prior to its roll-out? >> >>> I have looked at JIRA, and I am aware of some debates via this list >> >>> back in 2009 regarding the incorporation of aspects of Robust-Task >> >>> from Min Cha (this has morphed into Whitetask - see >> >>> https://code.google.com/p/whitetask/). In addition I note guice/spring >>> integration has been raised in some form. >> >>> >> >>> Hence what are the next steps for commons-chain? I am more than happy >> >>> to get involved with this. >> >>> >> >>> Regards, >> >>> >> >>> Steve Westwood >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
