Le 30/05/2013 11:40, Phil Steitz a écrit : > Sorry for stupidity above. I was not thinking through the > consequences of the gump-esque build process. I guess if we really > want to support everything building from source with no binary > incompatible change, we are going to have to support the 1.x code > suitably hacked forward indefinitely. This is not a happy prospect; > but given how widely used DBCP is, we should do it. Given this, I > agree with your original proposal that we build in another layer of > filtering to the 1.x code base, with the no-op patch merged in. I > will play with this over the weekend and see if I can get an Ant > build working that extends what we do now to produce 1.3.x from the > 1.4.x sources to also source a 1.5.x.
Thank you Phil. Hopefully this kind of maintenance happens only once every 2 years. Emmanuel Bourg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
