On 20 August 2013 22:38, Torsten Curdt <[email protected]> wrote: > There was the java5 "hack" and the java6 version. > IMO the java5 one should be dropped (if we haven't done so yet) but
If it works, why don't we keep it? > IIRC the java6 version is not really finished. Also, it needs Java 1.6+. Though maybe we can build with 1.6, but still targetting 1.5 (so we get the 1.6 API). Hopefully that would allow everything to work on Java 1.6+; and all but jsr199 should run on 1.5. This needs to be tested; might need some extra catch clauses to improve the error reporting. The alternative would be to use reflection, but that's quite tedious to do. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
