>> There was the java5 "hack" and the java6 version. >> IMO the java5 one should be dropped (if we haven't done so yet) but > > If it works, why don't we keep it?
Well, it uses private API and does not work beyond java5 >> IIRC the java6 version is not really finished. > > Also, it needs Java 1.6+. Indeed > Though maybe we can build with 1.6, but still targetting 1.5 (so we > get the 1.6 API). > > Hopefully that would allow everything to work on Java 1.6+; and all > but jsr199 should run on 1.5. True. But the old javac will not run on 1.6+ > The alternative would be to use reflection, but that's quite tedious to do. Yuck :) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
