Bleh, just make [compress] depend on [io], nice and simple. Gary
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1... this seems to be the best approach for independent components without > code duplication. > > Matt > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Torsten Curdt <tcu...@vafer.org> wrote: > > > > The current [compress] codebase has already copied bigger chunks of > > > IOUtils and some stream classes from [io]. Whether we intend to keep > > > copying stuff around for [compress2] or simply make [io] a dependency > is > > > something I see as a separate issue. One that wants to get addressed, > > > though. > > > > I vote for a hidden dependency (automatically inlining only the needed > > classes in a different namespace at build time with the maven shade > > plugin) > > > > cheers, > > Torsten > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
