On 27 January 2014 18:31, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Bleh, just make [compress] depend on [io], nice and simple.

Agreed.


> Gary
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1... this seems to be the best approach for independent components without
>> code duplication.
>>
>> Matt
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Torsten Curdt <tcu...@vafer.org> wrote:
>>
>> > > The current [compress] codebase has already copied bigger chunks of
>> > > IOUtils and some stream classes from [io].  Whether we intend to keep
>> > > copying stuff around for [compress2] or simply make [io] a dependency
>> is
>> > > something I see as a separate issue.  One that wants to get addressed,
>> > > though.
>> >
>> > I vote for a hidden dependency (automatically inlining only the needed
>> > classes in a different namespace at build time with the maven shade
>> > plugin)
>> >
>> > cheers,
>> > Torsten
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second 
> Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to