On 27 January 2014 18:31, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Bleh, just make [compress] depend on [io], nice and simple.
Agreed. > Gary > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1... this seems to be the best approach for independent components without >> code duplication. >> >> Matt >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Torsten Curdt <tcu...@vafer.org> wrote: >> >> > > The current [compress] codebase has already copied bigger chunks of >> > > IOUtils and some stream classes from [io]. Whether we intend to keep >> > > copying stuff around for [compress2] or simply make [io] a dependency >> is >> > > something I see as a separate issue. One that wants to get addressed, >> > > though. >> > >> > I vote for a hidden dependency (automatically inlining only the needed >> > classes in a different namespace at build time with the maven shade >> > plugin) >> > >> > cheers, >> > Torsten >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > >> > >> > > > > -- > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second > Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org