On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 12:15:42 -0500, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 1/19/15 7:51 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 19/01/2015 15:32, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
>
>> Now the question is: do we want to make an exception for the
Commons RDF
>> project?
> I don't think we should make an exception. Setting up mail filters
isn't
> that difficult.
+1
We don't have "subprojects" or "projects" within Commons. As Mark
pointed out, that is not allowed at the ASF. If you want to have a
separate project with separate lists, etc., then you need to go TLP.
All are welcome to join us. This looks like an interesting
component that would be broadly useful. Interesting people,
problems and code. Welcome, all!
But we are not just a groupId here. All of our components benefit
from the combined eyeballs we have. That is how it works and how it
*has* to work according to our charter and ASF "anti-umbrella"
rules.
Well said. Commons is a project with components, RDF would be another
component.
Words without semantics...
Looking up "apache project component" in a web search engine turned
out:
* "HttpComponents"
Here, the "components" are all related to "Http". Not so in
"Commons".
* "Camel-extra"
Herer (IIUC), the "components" all depend on a single framework. Not
so in "Commons".
* Others use the term "components" to describe the "sub-units" (for my
lacking of a better synonym of "component"...) of the software. Not
so in "Commons".
Gilles
Gary
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
