Hi Thomas, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 11/24/2015 11:30 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: >> Hi Thomas, >> >> Thomas Neidhart wrote: [snip] > These test failures exist since the 4.0 release, quoting your vote for > Collection 4.0 based on RC5: > >> +1, builds for all but one JDK flawlessly from source. I still have 2 >> failing tests for IBM JDK 1.6: >> >> Failed tests: >> AbstractMapTest$TestMapEntrySet.testMapEntrySetIteratorEntrySetValue:1656 >> expected:<true> but was:<false> >> AbstractMapTest$TestMapEntrySet.testMapEntrySetIteratorEntrySetValue:1656 >> expected:<true> but was:<false> >> >> However, since we already blamed that JDK, it does not influence the >> release. > > I can not remember anymore why these have not been worked-around though, > but I suspect that it was not so simple in this case. OK, at least it's no regression. >> ================================ %< =================== >> $ mvn-3.0 -version >> Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da; 2013-02-19 >> 14:51:28+0100) >> Maven home: /usr/share/maven-bin-3.0 >> Java version: 1.6.0, vendor: IBM Corporation >> Java home: /opt/ibm-jdk-bin-1.6.0.9_p2/jre >> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8 >> OS name: "linux", version: "4.1.12-gentoo", arch: "amd64", family: "unix" >> ================================ %< =================== >> >> It fails to compile with Java 8: >> >> ================================ %< =================== >> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------- >> [ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR : >> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------- >> [ERROR] /home/joehni/tmp/download/commons-collections4-4.1- >> src/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/collections4/FluentIterableTest.java: >> [242,41] reference to forEach is ambiguous >> both method forEach(java.util.function.Consumer<? super T>) in >> java.lang.Iterable and method >> forEach(org.apache.commons.collections4.Closure<? super E>) in >> org.apache.commons.collections4.FluentIterable match >> [INFO] 1 error >> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------- > > ok, this error has been already spotted by Oliver and fixed in trunk. It > is only in a test case where the type inference fails when passing a > null value to a method, as you usually do in tests. OK, fine with me. [snip] >> nor Java 9: > > ok. I have to investigate these errors, but I really wonder what we > should do about it. Java 1.9 is not released yet, and these might be > compiler related bugs that will be fixed, and adding work-arounds for > things that perfectly compile with all previous Java versions does not > sound right. I've update Java 9 now to the latest available (b93), but the problem stays. However, we have the same errors with 4.0.0, so it's actually no regression, but an indication that we need probably collections5 when Java 9 is final. Therefore +1 for this release. Cheers, Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
