On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 10:01 PM Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All: > > IMO. if [crypto] is to have a dependency on a logging framework, it should > be Log4j 2, not Commons Logging. Log4j 2 has an API module, which you can > pair with any number of implementations: Log4j's own Core, JUL, SLF4J, and > so on. > > I would prefer SLF4J, personally. It is by far the most popular based on my experience with the libraries that I use. This is assuming the component does use a logging framework. Others have suggested that it does not. I don't know that it really matters to me one way or the other, but I do know that in the past when I didn't have any logging when things went bump, it was hard to determine what to do to fix it. Some folks keep JMX stats and the like to help and I suppose that's an option.
