On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:14 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10 June 2016 at 10:46, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 11:12:23 +0200, Torsten Curdt wrote:
> >>
> >> FWIW
> >>
> >> I am not a fan of libraries and frameworks just logging away anyway.
> >>
> >> What I usually do this days:
> >> Have an interface in the library itself. Along the lines of
> >>
> >> public interface Console {
> >> void debug( String message );
> >> }
> >
> >
> > What you do here (simple usage) is the same as what "slf4j-api" or
> > "log4j2-api" do.
>
> Not really, because you also need a run-time implementation.
> That's two extra jars, regardless of whether any output is needed.
>
> And the user has to provide a configuration file (at least with log4j)
>
Exactly. It's so simple and it doesn't introduce any deps.
Whether that's goal one can align with is another matter.
But it means no logging framework discussions anymore ;)
