Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> schrieb am Mo., 20. Juni 2016 um 22:50 Uhr:
> JUnit has Assume which can allow to keep the test, wouldn't it be better? > What would be the condition of the assume call? > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > 2016-06-20 21:22 GMT+02:00 Benedikt Ritter <brit...@apache.org>: > > > Thomas Vandahl <t...@apache.org> schrieb am Mo., 20. Juni 2016 um 21:21 > Uhr: > > > > > On 19.06.16 10:47, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > we have failing tests on Jenkins for JCS [1]. Does anybody know what > > > caused > > > > this? > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Benedikt > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > https://builds.apache.org/view/Apache%20Commons/job/commons-jcs/159/org.apache.commons$commons-jcs-core/console > > > > > > > > > > The different systems I have access to do not show this problem. So I'm > > > not able to reproduce it. One of the failing tests hints that there is > > > no site-local address available in the Jenkins system, IOW no adapter > > > exists for which inetAddr.isSiteLocalAddress() returns true. > > > > > > Now the question is if that actually should be subject of a library > test > > > at all because it actually tests the correctness of a system > > > configuration and not the library. I'm tempted to remove/disable the > > > tests. WDYT? > > > > > > > Sounds reasonable. > > > > Benedikt > > > > > > > > > > Bye, Thomas. > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > > > >
