There has been a lot of support in the discussions for, as Emmanuel put it, a "base commons-math component".
Where does that factor into this proposal? On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like an attempt to put an end to all those discussions regarding > Commons Math (CM). That means, in particular, that we find an common > agreement on a course of action. So, here's a suggestion (might as > well call it an offer, because acceptance would mean a lot of work on > my side) > > 1.) I'll write a proposal to move CM to the Incubator. > 2.) We'll wait for the Incubators decision. If the Incubator accepts CM. > 3.) If the Incubator rejects CM, then I'd start another formal TLP vote. > 4.) If the board accepts the TLP: Very well. > 5.) If not: So what. Now we know, at least. > > In either case: At the end of the procedure, we'd have clarity. This > will allow us to focus on a smaller set of issues (technical), and we > can go on. > > The important part, to me, is to find something on which we can agree. > That doesn't mean that everyone is happy with the outcome, but that > everyone's got the feeling "I can live with that". In particular, > there must not be any serious opposition later on. If you'd like to > oppose: Please do so here, and now. > > Thanks, > > Jochen > > > > -- > The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!" > > > http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/evolution-of-the-wheel-300x85.jpg > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
