Le 23/06/2016 à 19:20, Jörg Schaible a écrit : > Hmm. Here I got lost. Do you now try to keep the "unsupported" parts in CM4 > or leave them out as proposed two lines above?
Well, that really depends on the usefulness of the parts considered. For example even if we have no developer expert in Fourier transforms, considering that it's a widely used algorithm that is already well covered by the unit tests, I think we should keep it. On the other hand, an unsupported part that is rarely useful could be dropped. > As long as we keep the name "CM" we make promises to existing users > and it is difficult to drop something. I don't see this as an issue, users relying on the removed parts can stick to CM 3.x (or switch to Hipparchus). Emmanuel Bourg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
