I think this is a good idea. It might even be more "generic" to indicate why it includes adaptor methods. The Banana RDF effort actually uses typeclasses with names like RDF and RDFOps.
--- A. Soroka Committer/PMC Apache Jena On 2016-09-15 07:11 (-0400), Stian Soiland-Reyes <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Should we rename RDFTermFactory to RDFFactory? Or just RDF? Someone > suggested that some time ago. > > The reason is that it does quite more than creating RDFTerms, e.g. > creating triples, graphs and datasets. > > > This might make it more obvious why its instances would also include > 'adaptation' methods from-to the underlying implementations, e.g. > asJenaNode(). > > Example: > > RDF rdf = new JenaRDF(); > IRI iri = rdf.createIRI("http://example.com/";); > Triple triple = rdf.createTriple(iri, iri, iri); > Graph g = rdf.createGraph(); > g.add(triple); > > > We can keep a @Deprecated parent RDFTermFactory interface with the > 0.2.0 method signatures (and remove it in 1.0.0) > > > -- > Stian Soiland-Reyes > http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
