On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 19:54:02 +0100, Eric Barnhill wrote:
Speaking for myself either is fine. I find svn commands easier to
deal with
than git, but github is easy to use as a site.
I find the above a little contradictory but since you are
going to manage this, it's up to you. ;-)
Gilles
Eric
On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org>
wrote:
On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 09:53:01 -0500, Matt Sicker wrote:
Is this a vote of some sort to convert from svn?
Not really (at least if your question is whether I ask to
convert the whole sandbox, or all sandbox components).
I thought that a sandbox component had to use the same repository
as all other sandbox components:
$ svn list http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox
Hence I suggested to Eric to create the new "filter" one.
But then I saw that the "Text" component is not listed by the above,
command but uses git.
So if this is OK, I'd rather ask for a new git repository for
"filter"
too (that is currently empty).
Regards,
Gilles
So far we've all been
pretty on board with migrating Commons projects to git.
On 4 November 2016 at 16:27, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org>
wrote:
Hello.
I noticed that the "Text" component uses "git".
It would be simpler to also use git for the "filter" component.
Regards,
Gilles
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
