Re: P.S. Is everyone happy with having to manually delete one-by-one all the 
distribution archives spuriously uploaded to Nexus?

Commons Parent 42 has a <attach>false</attach> setting for assembly plugin to 
prevent zips/gz from being uploaded to Nexus.  
Unfortunately, the last vote for parent 42 was cancelled for this very reason.  
(see [VOTE][LAZY] Release Commons Parent POM 42 based on RC1 
<http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/commons-dev/201612.mbox/%3cb02a39b7-7d68-414c-b596-218a28ec8...@honton.org%3E>)

regards,
chas


> On Dec 1, 2016, at 4:09 PM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 15:44:50 -0800, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>>> On Dec 1, 2016, at 3:32 PM, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 15:29:17 -0800, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>>>> Vote: -1 mainly for license,
>>> 
>>> Which files?
>> 
>> The LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt aren’t in the META-INF directory of
>> the main jar artifact for at least rng-core, whereas
>> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/commons/commons-lang3/3.5/commons-lang3-3.5.jar
>> <http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/commons/commons-lang3/3.5/commons-lang3-3.5.jar>
>> does contain those files.
> 
> I don't know when in the modularization process, those were dropped!
> Oh wait, I think I've spotted the problem.
> 
> Is that a blocker?
> 
>> Sorry…If you want I can hop in and see if I can get the assembly
>> plugin to accommodate for that and include them.
> 
> Help always welcome:
>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-23
> 
> There is another problem with generating the aggregate artefacts (aka
> distribution archives files): the "assembly" plugin did no generate
> neither the signature nor the checksum (cf. "dist-archive" module).
> Please have a look at that one while I fix the META-INF.
> 
> Thanks,
> Gilles
> 
> P.S. Is everyone happy with having to manually delete one-by-one
>     all the distribution archives spuriously uploaded to Nexus
>     by the "deploy" target?
>     There are 16 files to delete per module!
>     In the current case, I have to click 16 x 5 x 3 times to get
>     rid of them, for each RC. :-/
> 
>> 
>> -Rob
>> 
>>> 
>>>> but there’s the following as well.
>>>> 
>>>> I just ran “mvn clean test" with java 1.7.0_60 on OS X 10.12.1 and
>>>> got the following test failure (note that it seems to be
>>>> intermittent):
>>> 
>>> Cf. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-30
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Gilles
>>> 
>>>> testSampling[22:
>>>> data=org.apache.commons.math3.distribution.ParetoDistribution@185c0deb
>>>> (inverse method) [rng=org.apache.commons.rng.core.source64.TwoCmres
>>>> (Cmres: [0x11eab77f808cf641L, 32, 106120225] + Cmres:
>>>> [0x0f1505c780688cb5L, 33, 192641895])]: deciles=[55.074313383177326,
>>>> 143.04583109008863, 422.11049795027907, 1472.1250669034735,
>>>> 6450.716651619402, 39349.60019433535, 404957.85425759235,
>>>> 1.0824440136808794E7,
>>>> 2.9776288373121433E9]](org.apache.commons.rng.sampling.distribution.ContinuousSamplerParametricTest)
>>>> Time elapsed: 2.792 sec  <<< FAILURE!
>>>> java.lang.AssertionError:
>>>> org.apache.commons.math3.distribution.ParetoDistribution@185c0deb
>>>> (inverse method) [rng=org.apache.commons.rng.core.source64.TwoCmres
>>>> (Cmres: [0x11eab77f808cf641L, 32, 106120225] + Cmres:
>>>> [0x0f1505c780688cb5L, 33, 192641895])]: Too many failures for sample
>>>> size = 20000 (3 out of 50 tests failed, chi2=[24.237000000000002,
>>>> 21.682000000000002, 23.912000000000003]
>>>>    at
>>>> org.apache.commons.rng.sampling.distribution.ContinuousSamplerParametricTest.check(ContinuousSamplerParametricTest.java:127)
>>>>    at
>>>> org.apache.commons.rng.sampling.distribution.ContinuousSamplerParametricTest.testSampling(ContinuousSamplerParametricTest.java:53)
>>>> 
>>>> Running
>>>> org.apache.commons.rng.sampling.distribution.DiscreteSamplerParametricTest
>>>> Tests run: 14, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
>>>> 7.134 sec - in
>>>> org.apache.commons.rng.sampling.distribution.DiscreteSamplerParametricTest
>>>> Running org.apache.commons.rng.sampling.ListSamplerTest
>>>> Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.034
>>>> sec - in org.apache.commons.rng.sampling.ListSamplerTest
>>>> Running org.apache.commons.rng.sampling.PermutationSamplerTest
>>>> Tests run: 12, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
>>>> 0.014 sec - in org.apache.commons.rng.sampling.PermutationSamplerTest
>>>> 
>>>> Results :
>>>> 
>>>> Failed tests:
>>>> ContinuousSamplerParametricTest.testSampling:53->check:127
>>>> org.apache.commons.math3.distribution.ParetoDistribution@185c0deb
>>>> (inverse method) [rng=org.apache.commons.rng.core.source64.TwoCmres
>>>> (Cmres: [0x11eab77f808cf641L, 32, 106120225] + Cmres:
>>>> [0x0f1505c780688cb5L, 33, 192641895])]: Too many failures for sample
>>>> size = 20000 (3 out of 50 tests failed, chi2=[24.237000000000002,
>>>> 21.682000000000002, 23.912000000000003]
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Dec 1, 2016, at 6:18 AM, Artem Barger <ar...@bargr.net> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> My vote: +1
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>                    Artem Barger.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> My vote: +1 (binding)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Looking good!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Checked:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> +1 commit matches tag (even signed tag, yay!)
>>>>>> +0 commit matches src (git tag is missing
>>>>>> "<createChecksum>true</createChecksum>" -- why?)
>>>>>> +0 src matches staging repo -sources (hard to check as *-src.tar.gz
>>>>>> was not staged :-( )
>>>>>> +1 bin JARs matches staging repo hashes
>>>>>> +1 zip vs tar.gz
>>>>>> +1 .asc signatures of dist and repo
>>>>>> +1 md5/sha1 hashes (email's hash filenames says .sha1, but match
>>>>>> correctly the zip/tar.gz)
>>>>>> +0 mvn apache-rat:check (exceptions are already excluded for <reporting>)
>>>>>> +1 no unexpected binaries
>>>>>> +1 mvn clean install
>>>>>> +1 .. and afterwards in commons-rng-examples
>>>>>> +0 binary vs source (binary adds commons-rng-examples-1.0.jar, built
>>>>>> separately in source)
>>>>>> +1 RELEASE-NOTES
>>>>>> +1 LICENSE, NOTICE
>>>>>> +1 site (minor markdown highlight bug "64 bits" at
>>>>>> http://home.apache.org/~erans/commons-rng-1.0-RC5-site/userguide/rng.html)
>>>>>> +1 javadoc
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 30 November 2016 at 00:08, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons RNG 1.0 (from RC5).
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Main changes wrt the preceding vote (RC2, on September 16) are:
>>>>>>> * Modularization
>>>>>>> * Non-uniform deviates (in module "commons-rng-sampling")
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Tag name:
>>>>>>> RNG_1_0_RC5 (signature can be checked from git using 'git tag -v')
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Tag URL:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-rng.git;a=commit;h=
>>>>>> f9de6401e981554c3f44936c2272429e290fdbec
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Commit ID the tag points at:
>>>>>>> f9de6401e981554c3f44936c2272429e290fdbec
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Site:
>>>>>>> http://home.apache.org/~erans/commons-rng-1.0-RC5-site
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Distribution files:
>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/rng/
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Distribution files hashes (SHA1):
>>>>>>> de2a54518a0ef10ba5a2be1c3b060a441f4466e2  commons-rng-1.0-bin.tar.gz.
>>>>>> sha1
>>>>>>> cfcfde1f65dec9c30be1273ff2237d551eb87933  commons-rng-1.0-bin.zip.sha1
>>>>>>> 6d529de9418314066727a7d5ada88dd87dc0163d  commons-rng-1.0-src.tar.gz.
>>>>>> sha1
>>>>>>> 561dd3e5ebf53d60e883d5c04e543f58374c45b6  commons-rng-1.0-src.zip.sha1
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> KEYS file to check signatures:
>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Maven artifacts:
>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>> orgapachecommons-1225/
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release it.
>>>>>>> [ ] +0 Go ahead; I don't care.
>>>>>>> [ ] -0 There are a few minor glitches: ...
>>>>>>> [ ] -1 No, do not release it because ...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> This vote will close in 72 hours, at 2016-12-03T00:00:00Z (this is UTC
>>>>>>> time).
>>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Gilles
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 

Reply via email to